privacy and surveillance

BIG WINS:

• Strategic Partner on Minneapolis’s historic, bipartisan facial recognition ban; Unicorn pro-life/pro-choice coalition on reproductive surveillance + medical data privacy; city council testimony;
• Intellectual pivot of privacy to “Cancel Culture”/Social Forgiveness (NBC KARE-11). Awards/Pubs: Intl Vincentian Business Ethics (Runner-Up Best Paper); Georgetown Law; Competition Pol Intl; Ohio State Dissertation on post-digital privacy/law (How to Realign Our Rhetorical Judgments for the Post-Postmodern, Post-Digital Age).
• Teaching privacy and surveillance methods to citizens and professionals via local and international art/education/civic events (Digital Rights are Civil Rights;).
• Trainings/Events: Plugged In: Surveillance and Tech (ACLU MN + Lawmakers).

NERD STUFF: GEMINI'S SYNOPIS

• Assessing data collection, via ethos and post-digital character judgments, in the context of healthcare, policing, reproductive data, education, “cancel culture,” American politics, and employment (Transatlantic Dialogue on AI and Humanity, reported in Forbes; Law and Ethics of Big Data]; The Joke is On Us: Political Comedy in Late Neoliberal Times [Lexington Press] Rather than litigating "Data Silos,"
• The IDH OS treats privacy as a Narrative Sanctity issue. We utilize 2,000 years of rhetorical theory (and 120 of privacy law) to assess data collection via Ethos and Post-Digital Character Judgments. The OS provides a socio-technical logic-gate to protect high-entropy data (e.g., Reproductive Surveillance) where 20th-century legal doctrine and Silicon Valley "Terms of Service" fail.