IDH RESEARCH DIVISION
The IDH provides one holistic method for the whole mess:
AI / DISINFO / PRIVACY / FREE SPEECH
A unified "Meta-Method" (OS) for socio-technical alignment.
Instead of "data-labeling" patches, we use a dead-neutral framework derived from Constitutional DNA and 2,000 years of rhetorical theory.
IDH research division
DEAD-NEUTRAL, CONSTITUTIONAL, and ALREADY AGREED TO BY THE ACADEMICS
Best Paper (Runner Up) Primeaux Award:
"Using Narrative Theory to Rethink Digital Ethics."
Inaugural Transatlantic Dialogue on AI and Humanity
(Paris; Reported in Forbes)
Publications that industry/regular people
can understand: Nebraska Lawyer, Omaha World-Herald, Competition Policy International
DEAD NEUTRAL, CONSTITUTIONAL, and ALREADY AGREED TO BY THE ACADEMICS
Best Paper (Runner Up) Primeaux Award:
"Using Narrative Theory to Rethink Digital Ethics."
Inaugural Transatlantic Dialogue on AI and Humanity
(Paris; Reported in Forbes)
Publications that industry/regular people
can understand: Nebraska Lawyer, Omaha World-Herald, Competition Policy International
research division
DEAD-NEUTRAL and ALREADY IN THE DNA OF THE CONSTITUTION
Best Paper (Runner Up) Primeaux Award:
"Using Narrative Theory to Rethink Digital Ethics."
Inaugural Transatlantic Dialogue on AI and Humanity
(Paris; Reported in Forbes)
Publications that industry/regular people can understand: Nebraska Lawyer, Omaha World-Herald,
Competition Policy International
PRIVACY ISN'T OVER. EVERYONE JUST FORGOT WHERE TO FIND IT.
Rather than litigating "Data Silos," the IDH OS treats privacy as a Narrative Sanctity issue.
We utilize 2,000 years of rhetorical theory (and 120 of privacy law) to assess data collection via
Post-Digital Character Judgments.
The OS provides a socio-technical logic-gate to protect high-entropy data (e.g., Reproductive Surveillance) where 20th-century legal doctrine and Silicon Valley
"Terms of Service" fail.